Tuesday, May 07, 2019

Last Women On Earth - To Civilized

The last woman on Earth - 1960
Evelyn- will he follow us?
Martin -  As soon as he can start the truck.
E - What if he catches us? I mean Harold can be awfully brutal if he thinks he's been wronged.
M - people who believe in wrong and right can be.
E- what do you believe in, Martin?
M- Nothing Ev, I'm too civilized.

Written by Robert Towne

- Modernity, dictatorship, Liberalism,

Monday, May 06, 2019

We shall Fight - Winston Churchill 1940

We are assured that novel methods will be adopted, and when we see the originality of malice, the ingenuity of aggression, which our enemy displays, we may certainly prepare ourselves for every kind of novel stratagem and every kind of brutal and treacherous maneuver. I think that no idea is so outlandish that it should not be considered and viewed with a searching, but at the same time, I hope, with a steady eye. We must never forget the solid assurances of sea power and those which belong to air power if it can be locally exercised. . . . . 


 Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God’s good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.


Winston Churchill to Parliament in 1940

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Your God is too Small - JB Phillips

Your God is to Small JB Philips Pg 36 - 38

There is a conception of God which seems at first sight, to be very lofty in splendid, but which proves paradoxically enough on examination to be yet another of the 'too small' ideas. It is to think that the guy who is responsible for the ferret terrifying vastness of the universe cannot be possibly interested in the lives of than minute specs of the consciousness which exists on an insignificant planet.
To have even the beginning of the in appreciation of the greatness of the Power controlling the incredible system that science is beginning to reveal to us is a staggering but salutatory experience. We may feel the sense God is so huge in our whole sphere (let alone an individual man) is so minut by comparison, that we cannot conceive his taking the detailed interest in a single human life at the protagonist of the Christian religion affirm. To those oh, and they are not a few, who are secretly wishing for a release from moral responsibility ( and is every argument about religion is colored by the desire),be a great relief --  sort of relief of a Schoolboy might find in realizing that in a school of a thousand Corey's his peccadilloes are very unlikely to be noticed by the Headmaster. To others the thought of their insignificance may be desolating -- they feel not so much set free as cast adrift.
But whatever a man's reaction may be to the idea of the terrific 'size' of God, the point to note is that his comment is this: 'I cannot imagine such a tremendous God being interested in me' and so on.  He 'cannot imagine': which means simply that his mind is incapable of retaining the ideas of terrifying vastness and of minute attention to microscopic detail at the same time. But it is in no way proves that God is incapable of fulfilling both ideas (and a great many more).
Behind this inability to conceive such a god there probably lies the unconscious, but very common, cause of "inadequate gods' -- the tendency to build up a mental picture of God from our knowledge and experience of man. We know, for instance, that if a man is in charge of fifty other men he can fairly easily make himself familiar with the history, character, abilities, and peculiarities, of each man. If he is in charge of five hundred he may still take a personal interest in each one, but it is almost impossible for him to know and retain in his memory personal details of the individual If he is in charge of five thousand men he may in general be wise and benevolent; but he cannot, indeed he does not attempt to know his men as individuals. the higher he is, the fewer his individual contacts. Because in our modern world we are tending more and more  to see men amassed in large numbers, for various purposes, we are forced to realize that the individual care of the ' one in charge' Maestro left a mess this realization has permeated our unconscious minds, and we find it inevitably suggested to us that the Highest of All must have the  que es contacts with the individual. Indeed if He is Infinitely High the idea of contact with the infinitesimal small individual becomes laughable.
But only if we are  modeling God upon what we know of men. That is why it is contended here that what we at first sight appears to be almost super adequate idea of God is, in reality, inadequate -- it is based on two tiny a foundation. Man may be made in the image of God;  but it is not sufficient to conceive God as nothing more than an infinitely magnified man.
You do know I'm still there who do the lines to you can just fill in that I thought you drew it in if I thought you drew the tracks


Second hand Gun
A skillful writer can make us feel that we have entered the very hearts and lives of these,  and many other, people. Almost without question, we had what we have read or seeing to the sum total of what we call 'experience'. The process is almost entirely automatic, and probably most of us would be greatly shocked if it could suddenly be revealed to us how small a proportion of our accumulated 'knowledge of the world' is due to our first-hand observation and experience.
The significance of the second-hand knowledge of life to the subject we are considering is this: the conception of the Character of God which slowly forms in our minds is largely made by the conclusions we draw from the 'providences' and 'judgements' of life. We envisage 'God' very largely from the way in which he appears to deal with (or not to deal with) His creatures. If, therefore, our knowledge of life is (unknown to us in all probability) faulty or biased or sentimental, we are quite likely to find ourselves a second-hand god who is quite different from the real one.  pg 39-40



False Galilean
If they were completely honest, many people would have to admit that God is to them an almost entirely negative force in their lives. It is not merely that He provides that 'gentle voice we hear . . .  which checks each fault', but that His whole Nature seems to deny, to cramp, and inhibit their own. Though such people whole never admit it, they are living endorsement of Swinburne's bitter lines:
Thou hast conquered, O pale Galilean,
The world has grown grey from their breath.
Compared with their non=Christian contemporaries their lives seem to have less life and colour, less spontaneity and less confidence. Their god surrounds them with prohibitions but he does not supply them with vitality and courage. They may live under the shadow of his hand but it makes them stunted, pale and weak. Although the thought would appear blasphemous to his devotees, such a god is quite literally a blight upon human life, and no one can be surprised that he fails to attract the loyalty of those with spirit, independence, and a keen enjoyment of the colour and richness of life.
The words written above are a plain exposure of a false god, but of course, the unhappy worshippers never see their bondage as clearly as that or they would break away. They are bound to their negative god by the manipulation of isolated text of scripture or by a morbid conscience. At last, they actually feel that it is wrong to be themselves, wrong to be free, wrong to enjoy Beauty, Ron to expand and develop. Unless they have their gods permission they can do nothing. Disaster will infallibly bring them to heel, sooner or later, should they Venture beyond the confines of 'his planned for them'.
Such people, naturally enough, can only by strenuous efforts maintain their narrow loyalty. They do not get the chance to admire and love and worship and wordless longing one who is overwhelmingly Splendid and beautiful and lovable. At best they can only love and worship because their God is a jealous God, and it is his will and Commandment that they should. Their lives are cramped and narrow and joyless, because their God is the same. There must be compensations in the worship of such a God, and they usually are these.

1. The belief that the joy and freedom of those who do not subscribe to the worship. Of the negative God is just an illusion. Negative God worshippers often sustain themselves by imagining and elaborating upon the inner strange and conflicts of those who do not know their God. In fact, the strange and conflicts of ordinary  life are quite rightly felt by sensible people to be preferable to the Intolerable and never-ending strain of worshiping a God who drains the life of all its vitality in colour

2. There is a certain spiritual masochistic joy and being crushed by the Juggernaut of a negative God this is perfectly brought out in him which is still song in certain circles:
Oh to be nothing, nothing,
Only to lie at His feet,
A broken and empty vessel
For the Masters use made meet.
The sense of humor is, of course, suspended by the negative God, or his devotees would be bound to see the absurdity of anyone's ambition being to be ' nothing', a 'broken' and, not unnaturally, ' emptied' vessel line at gods feet! Better still, the New Testament ( a book full of freedom and joy, courage and vitality) might be a searched in vain to supply any endorsement whatsoever of the above truly Dreadful verse and the conception of God it typifies. if ever a book taught man to be 'something, something', to stand and do battle, to be far more full of joy and daring and life than they ever were without God --  that book is the New Testament!

3. The comforting idea of being ' something' special. Worshipers of the negative god often Comfort themselves by feeling that what is good enough for 'the world' is not good enough for them:  the chosen, the unique. Even though this means a life denuded of the beauties of art, abnormal pleasures, and Recreation, alive cramped in normal means of expression--that is a small price to paying the separate,. unique
This pathetic idea of being '' something special, is clung to with desperation so that we find worshippers of the negative God who knows in their secret hearts that their lives cannot really exhibit any Superior qualities to those of their ' worldly' or 'worldly Christian' friends, clean tightly to the rules of '  separateness-- so that they may at least feel  that they are marked out as a special favorites of their God!
All this is very unattractive men in Pleasant oh, but it is quite common among religious people the question for them is: dare they defy and break away from this imaginary god with a Perpetual frown and find the one who is the great Positive, who gives life, courage enjoy, and  wants His  Suns and daughters to stand on their own feet? 

- Jesus, Humanity, Satan, God,

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Monday, March 11, 2019

Christian Drift -------The Hole in our Gospel ------ Richard Stearns

This has always been a problem with God's people; we tend to drift away from God's bold vision, replacing it with a safer, tamer vision of our own.
The Hole in our Gospel  ------ Richard Stearns

Pastors survey on Priorities The Hole in our Gospel ------ Richard Stearns

A few years ago World Vision did a survey of pastors, in which we asked them to rate the things they considered real priorities for their churches. Based on a list of items that we provided, these ministers were to tell us which ones they thought took precedence over the others. In the highest-priority category, 79 percent listed worship: 57 percent, evangelism; 55 percent, children's ministry; and 47 percent, discipleship programs. Just 18 percent said that "helping poor and disadvantaged people overseas" was of highest priority." Startling when you consider the words of the apostle James: "Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world" (James 1:27)
The Hole in our Gospel  ------ Richard Stearns

Saturday, March 09, 2019

Thursday, March 07, 2019

A Good Movie has a memorable scenes.... Donald Miller

A good movie has memorable scenes
and so does a good life.
Donald Miller

I simply don't believe utopia is going to happen - Donald Miller

I simply don't believe utopia is going to happen. I don't believe we are going to be rescued. I don't believe an active man will make things on earth perfect, and I don't believe God will intervene before I die, or for that matter before you die. I believe instead we will go on longing for a resolution that will  not come, not within life as we know it, anyway.
If you think about it an enormous amount of damage is created by the myth of utopia. There is an intrinsic feeling in nearly every person that your life could be perfect that if you only had such and such a car, or such and such spouse, or such and such job. We believe we will be made whole by our accomplishments, our positions, our social status. It's written in the fabric of our DNA that life used to be beautiful and now it isn't, and if only this and if only that it would be beautiful again.
Donald Miller  - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years.



Wednesday, January 30, 2019

A conference - Fred Allen

A conference is a gathering of important people who singly can do nothing but together can decide that nothing can be done. Fred Allen 1894

California is a fine place to live in - Fred Allen

California is a fine place to live in - if you happen to be an orange

Fred Allen 1894

Sunday, December 30, 2018

Desiring God: If We Love God Most, We Will Love Others Best

Article by 
Jon Bloom
Staff writer, desiringGod.org
The most loving thing we can do for others is love God more than we love them. For if we love God most, we will love others best.
I know this sounds like preposterous gobbledygook to an unbeliever. How can you love someone best by loving someone else most? But those who have encountered the living Christ understand what I mean. They know the depth of love and breadth of grace that flows out from them toward others when they themselves are filled with love for God and all he is for them and means to them in Jesus. And they know the comparatively shallow and narrow love they feel toward others when their affection for God is ebbing.
There’s a reason why Jesus said the second greatest commandment is like the first: if we love God with all our heart, we will love our neighbor as ourselves (Matthew 22:37–39). It functions like faith and works; if we truly have the first, the second naturally follows.
But if God is not the love of our life, there is no way that we will truly love our neighbor as ourselves. For we will love ourselves supremely.
He First Loved Us
The reason we will love others best when we love God most is that love in its truest, purest form only comes from God, because God is love (1 John 4:7–8). Love is a fundamental part of his nature. We are only able to love him or anyone else because he first loved us (1 John 4:19). We are only able to give freely to others what we have received freely from him.
And as God’s image-bearers (Genesis 1:26), we are designed to love God and others in the same way that God loves God and others. God, being the most pure, perfect, powerful, and precious entity in existence, must love himself most in order to love everything else best, since everything else is “from him and through him and to him” (Romans 11:36). If God loved something or someone else more than himself he would be violating the first commandment (Exodus 20:3) and the foremost commandment (Matthew 22:37–38). For God to love something or someone more than himself would be inappropriate, perverted, immoral. Like God, we must love him supremely in order to love everything else best.
The Horrible Result of Not Loving God Most
When we (or anything else, if that’s possible) become our supreme love instead of God, love becomes distorted and diseased. Love ends up devolving into whatever we wish for it to mean.
This is a great evil, greater than we often realize. This is the world as we know it: everyone loves in the way that is right in his own eyes. Which of course means that everyone hates in the way that is right in his own eyes. They become supreme “lovers of self” (2 Timothy 3:2) and live “in the passions of [their] flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind,” since they were “children of wrath” (Ephesians 2:3). It is not hard to understand why there is so much confusion and conflict and heartbreak and violence in the world. We live in an anarchy of love resulting in much of the horrifying things we hear in the news.
The Greatest Love Ever Shown
But God, being rich in mercy (Ephesians 2:4), “so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). The author and perfecter of love, Love himself, stepped into our horrible evil anarchy to redeem us (Romans 5:8), his people, and give us new life (Ephesians 2:5), and transform us from children of wrath back into children of God (John 1:12) who are able to love him supremely and therefore love each other rightly — the way he has loved us.
And how has he loved us? With the greatest love there is, the love that moves one to lay down his life for his friends (John 15:13). But this doesn’t mean that Jesus loved us, his friends, more than his Father. It means that Jesus loved us best because he loved his Father most (John 17:26; Mark 14:36). And “if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another” (1 John 4:11).
What May Be Our Most Loving Act Today
So we see that if we love God most, we will love others best.
I find this to be a convicting and uncomfortable truth: How we love others, particularly other Christians, reveals how we love God. The apostle John puts it bluntly: “He who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen (1 John 4:20). Our love for each other is an indicator of the place God is holding in our hearts.
God is very good at designing things this way: our faith is revealed by our works (James 2:18), our creeds are revealed by our deeds (Luke 6:46), and our love for him is revealed by our love for others (1 John 4:20). He makes it very hard for us to fake it. And this is a great kindness (Romans 2:4).
Since the greatest and second greatest commandments are involved in these things, we know they are important to God. So perhaps the best thing we can do today is take an honest, lingering look at the way we love others, allow what we see to have its Philippians 2:12effect on us, and ask God what he would have us do in response.
We may find that this is the most loving thing we will do for everyone else today.
Jon Bloom (@Bloom_Jon) serves as author, board chair, and co-founder of Desiring God. He is author of three books, Not by Sight, Things Not Seen, and Don’t Follow Your Heart. He and his wife live in the Twin Cities with their five children.
6.3K
Get Desiring God in Your Inbox
A nightly brief of new resources, and peeks behind the scenes from our editorial team
Subscribe
ARTICLE
He Held the Stars in Place
The infinite became an infant. His mother held him, while he held the moon and stars in place.
Bob Kauflin
5.7K
ARTICLE
Enter the Dragon Slayer
From the garden, to the manger, through the cross, to that final day, watch the devil rise in anticipation, writhe in agony, and then fall before the Dragon Slayer.
Jon Bloom
God is most glorified in us
when we are most satisfied in himLearn more about Desiring God 
DESIRING GOD

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Theology is but an appendix...Toyohiko Kagawa







"Theology is but an appendix to love, and an unreliable appendix!"


Japanese evangelist Toyohiko Kagawa 

Search This Blog